Community Engagement
Community Engagement

Community Engagement

We are committed to establishing meaningful, constructive dialogue with local communities, understanding and taking action on their concerns and demands. Hearing and responding to our stakeholders’ expectations and requests is very important to us, and we resolve any complaints and grievances raised in a thorough manner and through open and transparent communication mechanisms.

Targets and Performance

Performance in 2023

  • 816
    Held 816 community meetings
  • 24,658
    Received 24,658 visits from stakeholders
  • 10,000
    More than 10,000 community members visited us

Community Engagement and Communication Framework

Zijin Mining’s Community Engagement and Communication Framework

  • Objective
    Step
    Content
  • Taking a holistic approach
    ldentify the affected communities and stakeholder groups.
    During the planning stage of a project, we conduct social surveys to collect and understand the backgrounds of the communities, including but not limited to geographical, political and historical context and demographics as well as religious and cultural values. We also perform a social impact assessment to define the effects and potential risks of the project on the host region along with the sections of society affected.
  • Clear communication channels
    Engage the community by providing affected groups with access to relevant information.
    In the community engagement process, we share information with the local communities through various channels depending on the local environment and culture. This includes radio broadcasts, social media, websites, publications and a series of face-to-face workshops, for them to fully understand our efforts to mitigate the impact on the communities.
  • Establishing channels
    Listen to the views of the affected communities on the environmental and social impacts brought by our operations.
    We develop mitigation plans and measures based on the concerns of the affected groups and the environmental and social risks that may arise from our operation. According to the results of our social impact assessment as well as the feedback from the communities, we establish a community impact management database and update it regularly during the course of the project.
  • Effective implementation
    Integrate the views of the affected communities into the decision-making process of our operations
    We listen extensively to views and feedback from various stakeholders through communication and grievance mechanisms, and thoroughly incorporate the voices of the communities, especially those from vulnerable groups (e.g. women, children and indigenous people), into the decision-making processes for project planning and community programs.
  • Monitoring and responding
    Set up communication and grievance mechanisms for the affected communities
    To ensure effective communication and engagement with the communities and stakeholders, we have set up community relations teams at all of our operational sites, which are staffed primarily by local employees. We also have clear community communication and grievance mechanisms to promptly understand and respond to the concerns of the communities.
  • Monitoring and responding
    Report progress to affected communities and stakeholder groups
    We require each project to regularly review the progress of community communication, assess the effectiveness of the community grievance mechanism and report improvements to stakeholders in a timely manner. This is aimed at forming a proactive and effective two-way communication and feedback mechanism.

Grievance and Communication

In accordance with the criteria set in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights for judging the effectiveness of grievance mechanisms, we regularly review the effectiveness of our communication and grievance mechanisms, make suggestions for improvement and report on progress to stakeholders in a timely manner. This is aimed at developing a positive and efficient two-way communication and feedback mechanism.

UNGPs Criteria for Evaluating Effectiveness of Grievance Mechanisms

  • Objective
    Step
  • Legitimate
    Enabling trust from the stakeholder groups for whose use they are intended, and being accountable for the fair conduct of grievance processes
  • Accessible
    Being known to all stakeholder groups for whose use they are intended, and providing adequate assistance for those who may face barriers to access
  • Predictable
    Providing a clear and open procedure with an indicative time frame for each stage, and clarity on the types of process and outcome available and means of monitoring implementation
  • Equitable
    Seeking to ensure that aggrieved parties have equal facility of access to sources of information, advice, and expertise necessary in order to engage in a grievance process on fair, informed and respectful terms.
  • Transparent
    Keeping parties to a grievance informed about its progress, and providing sufficient information about the mechanism’s performance and the true state of affairs so as to build confidence in its effectiveness and meet any public interest at stake.
  • Rights-compatible
    Ensuring that outcomes and remedies accord with internationally recognized human rights
  • A source of continuous learning
    Drawing on relevant measures to identify lessons for improving the mechanism and preventing future grievances and harms
  • Based on engagement and dialogue
    Consulting the stakeholder groups for whose use the grievance and communication mechanisms are intended for feedback on their design and performance, and focusing on dialogue as the means to address and resolve issues.